Read ß Life 30 Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence Î PDF DOC TXT eBook or Kindle ePUB free

Free download Life 30 Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Read ß Life 30 Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence Î PDF, DOC, TXT, eBook or Kindle ePUB free Ù ❴KINDLE❵ ❀ Life 30 Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence Author Max Tegmark – Dogsalonbristol.co.uk How will ArtificB market and perhaps altogether Will AI help life flourish like never before or give us power than we can handleWhat sort of future do you want This book empowers you to join what may be the most important conversation of our time It doesn't shy away from the full range of viewpoints or from the most controversial issues from superintelligence to meaning consciousness and the ultimate physical limits on life in the cosm. Life 30 is in turns enlightening and infuriating It is worth reading for the many enlightening bits We are likely to invent AI soon 1 What could happen next and 2 what should happen next To tackle this subject satisfyingly would reuire somebody who is an unbiased AI researcher a psychologist a neuroscientist a moral philosopher a metaphysician a philosopher of mind an economist a political scientist a poet and perhaps Since that person doesn't exist we're stuck with Tegmark who is none of the above He is a physicist and a cosmologist As a result Tegmark often tries to forcefully shove physics shaped answers into AIeconomicsphilosophywhatever shaped problems when all you have is a hammer everything looks like a nailHowever Tegmark is smart curious and open minded and has an impressive talent for networking helped in part by his credentials as a physicist He has privileged access to a broad range of top thinkers from various disciplines including much of the top brass of AI research In Life 30 Tegmark is at his best when he acts as a curator and interpreter explaining a broad range of ideas in a simple accessible fashion There's a lot of exciting things to learn from in this book on domains as varied as game theory applied to hierarchical organization teleological interpretations of physical laws and the scope of potential futures resulting from the irruption of human level AI They're often covered at a rather superficial level but you've got to start somewhereSo there are a lot of good ideas But the distribution of ideas that Tegmark is drawing from is heavily skewed towards the hard sciences Often the humanities incl philosophy economics are not given a say even when their contribution is not just relevant but indispensable For instance when Tegmark discusses the origin of the values that govern human behavior he concludes that it does not fit our genes but our feelings Bizarrely forgetting about culture At another point we spend considerable time discussing how much intelligent life the universe can harbor with barely a word on why that's a good thing Yet another omission concerns the medium term conseuences of sub human AI in terms of employment political manipulation and so on; these very urgent issues are uickly dismissed in a few superficial pagesOverall then Life 30 is a good book that suffers from massive blind spots Think of it as a four or five stars book from which half the pages have been torn awayPS in a hilariously groveling sentence Tegmark describes his benefactor Elon Musk as tall handsome elouent and incredibly knowledgeable Much of Tegmark's interesting work is funded rather generously by Elon Musk One wonders how Musks' ongoing RUD rapid unscheduled disassembly is going to affect the project

Review å PDF, DOC, TXT, eBook or Kindle ePUB free Ö Max Tegmark

How will Being Human PDFEPUB #235 Artificial Intelligence affect crime war justice jobs society and our very sense of being human The rise of AI has the potential to transform our future than any other technology and there's nobody better Life 30 PDFEPUBualified or situated to explore that future than Max Tegmark an MIT professor who's helped mainstream research on how to keep AI beneficialHow can we grow our prosperity. I have to confess that my first reaction to this book was not anything to do with the contents but trying to work out if there was something really clever about the the way the book's title is printed on the spine in white on cream so it's illegible would it be for example a subtle test of human versus artificial intelligence AI However that was just a distractionMax Tegmark is an interesting and provocative thinker in the physics arena so I had high hopes for what he'd come up with exploring the future of AI and its relationship to human beings It's worth explaining that the title of the book refers to three 'levels' of life where 10 is 'can survive and replicate' eg bacteria 20 is can design its own software eg us where 'software' refers to our concepts ideas and extended abilities such as language and 30 is can design its own hardware enabling it to transform itself directly and uickly than our creativity enables us to doThe book starts with a bit of fiction which I'm usually nervous about but it actually works very well as it's presented like a non fiction description of a business development rather than attempting all the uirks of fiction In it we have a semi plausible description of how a company that succeeds in producing a self enhancing AI could take over the world And this is genuinely thought provokingSo early on I was convinced I was going to love this book But unfortunately there is an awful lot of futurology in here aka guesswork and like all futurology Tegmark's can be frustratingly specific about things that we are highly unlikely to be able to predict though at least he recognises this is the case and points it out He covers the various ways a super intelligent AI could develop whether it would become a rogue how we'd interact with it and then plunges on into and dramatic speculation including a chapter that looks forward 'the next billion years and ' Forgive me for feeling a bit 'So what' about thisThere is no doubt the whole business of super AIs is an issue that needs thinking about and discussing and Tegmark does this in an approachable and engaging fashion It probably needs reading alongside Nick Bostrom's Superintelligence to get a well rounded picture though It would have helped if it had been significantly shorter it came across as being long because it was the kind of 'big book' that has to be chunky and I think it would have been a lot effective at half its length One particular section that was ripe for trimming had a long list of scenarios each of which was then worked through dull reading I'm afraid In the end futurology is a bit like being told about someone else's dream It probably seems fascinating to them but it's hard to get too excited about it as a reader Life 30 is an interesting book but feels rather like a pet project rather than a strong popular science title

Max Tegmark Ö 2 Free read

Life 30 Being Human in the Age of Artificial IntelligenceThrough automation without leaving people lacking income or purpose 30 Being Human PDFEPUB #236 What career advice should we give today's kids How can we make future AI systems robust so that they do what we want without crashing malfunctioning or getting hacked Should we fear an arms race in lethal 30 Being Human in the Epubautonomous weapons Will machines eventually outsmart us at all tasks replacing humans on the jo. Nothing in this book was original All of the many topics covered in this book were covered in other books that I have read previously There was definitely a tedious feel to each of the chapters I think there is no important or interesting topic then super AI and the author is right when he wants to highlight the topic but please tell me things I don’t already know The author started each chapter by telling me something that I had already knew then he would tell me almost nothing than what I knew then he would summarize what he had said as if I had not already had read it elsewhere or within the chapter Overall the lack of depth of each topic presented made for a tedious presentationI’m not even bothered by the things I think he got wrong He makes a categorical error on the nature of our feelings He thinks of them as things or objects which give us our subjective reality subjectivity is his standard for self awareness consciousness I don’t think our feeling are things He also appealed to S1 uick verse S2 reflective memory states He had brought that up right after mentioning Popper’s falsification criteria I found that somewhat ironic because S1 S2 definitely fall into the pseudo science realm because there is no experiment in principal that I could design that would refute that S1 S2 paradigmatic hypothesis I had a lot of these kinds of problems with this book but the book failed mostly because it was superficial and it did not give a compelling narrative to wow the reader There is no interesting topic than super AI It gets at the heart of what it means to be human what our purpose and meaning is what is consciousness is there other complex life in the universe yes super AI relates to the Fermi paradox with self replicating von Neumann machines and even whether or not we are living within a simulation by all means check out Neil deGrasse Tyson’s ‘are we living in a simulation’ hosted debate It is well worth the two hours and there is a way to tie Martin Heidegger into the discussion because his ready at hand present at hand and dasein schema means that solipsism is nonsensical and conscious self aware machines are not possible his opinion not mine or one could mention Hegel in detail on these topics because of his relating the in itself to the for itself to the other or in other words the subjective to the objective to spirit or self awareness but this author definitely didn’t have much philosophy behind him and it showed by his lack of depth regarding philosophy or philosophy of science I have a weakness for books about AI There should be no way that they bore me but this author did that by not being able to connect the dots and by only telling me things that were overly familiar and having no real philosophical background as a foundation Read Bostrom’s or Kurzweil’s or Pedro Domingos’ book or either of Harari’s books Each except for Domingo was mentioned in this book